4.8 Article

Serial millisecond crystallography for routine room-temperature structure determination at synchrotrons

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00630-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SwissFEL
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_153145, 31003A_159558]
  3. European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7) [290605]
  4. ETH Zurich through the NCCR MUST
  5. ETH FAST programme
  6. H2020 ITN network X-probe [637295]
  7. Data Analysis Service project of the Swiss Universities SUC-P2 program [142-004]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_153145, 31003A_159558] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historically, room-temperature structure determination was succeeded by cryo-crystallography to mitigate radiation damage. Here, we demonstrate that serial millisecond crystallography at a synchrotron beamline equipped with high-viscosity injector and high frame-rate detector allows typical crystallographic experiments to be performed at room-temperature. Using a crystal scanning approach, we determine the high-resolution structure of the radiation sensitive molybdenum storage protein, demonstrate soaking of the drug colchicine into tubulin and native sulfur phasing of the human G protein-coupled adenosine receptor. Serial crystallographic data for molecular replacement already converges in 1,000-10,000 diffraction patterns, which we collected in 3 to maximally 82 minutes. Compared with serial data we collected at a free-electron laser, the synchrotron data are of slightly lower resolution, however fewer diffraction patterns are needed for de novo phasing. Overall, the data we collected by room-temperature serial crystallography are of comparable quality to cryo-crystallographic data and can be routinely collected at synchrotrons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available