4.6 Article

Peripheral Isolates as Sources of Adaptive Diversity under Climate Change

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00088

Keywords

assisted gene flow; climate change; local adaptation; geographic variation; targeted gene flow

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1094646, FL110100104, DP130100318, FT160100198]
  2. Wet Tropics Management Authority
  3. Tropical Landscapes Joint Venture (CSIRO)
  4. Tropical Landscapes Joint Venture (JCU)
  5. Australian Research Council [FL110100104, DP1094646] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As climate change progresses, there is increasing focus on the possibility of using targeted gene flow (TGF, the movement of pre-adapted individuals into declining populations) as a management tool. Targeted gene flow is a relatively cheap, low-risk management option, and will almost certainly come into increased use over the coming decades. Before such action can be taken, however, we need to know where to find pre-adapted individuals. We argue that, for many species, the obvious place to look for this diversity is in peripheral isolates: isolated populations at the current edges of a species' range. Both evolutionary and ecological considerations suggest that the bulk of a species' adaptive variation may be contained in the total set of these peripheral isolates. Moreover, by exploring both evolutionary and ecological perspectives it becomes clear that we should be able to assess the potential value of each isolate using remotely sensed data and three measurable axes of variation in patch traits: population size, connectivity, and climatic environment. Locating the sweet spot in this trait space, however, remains a challenge. Throughout, we illustrate these ideas using Australia's Wet Tropics rainforests as a model system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available