4.8 Article

Large-scale water collection of bioinspired cavity-microfibers

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01157-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [GRF 17237316, 17211115, 17207914]
  2. University of Hong Kong [URC 201511159108, 201411159074]
  3. Shandong Academy of Sciences [2015.4-2017.4]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 11504238]
  5. Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province [2016A050503048]
  6. Fundamental Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20160229164007864]
  7. Zhejiang Provincial Government
  8. Hangzhou Municipal Government
  9. Lin'an County Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale and high-efficient water collection of microfibers with long-term durability still remains challenging. Here we present well-controlled, bioinspired spindle-knot microfibers with cavity knots (named cavity-microfiber), precisely fabricated via a simple gas-in-water microfluidic method, to address this challenge. The cavity-microfiber is endowed with unique surface roughness, mechanical strength, and long-term durability due to the design of cavity as well as polymer composition, thus enabling an outstanding performance of water collection. The maximum water volume collected on a single knot is almost 495 times than that of the knot on the cavity-microfiber. Moreover, the spider-web-like networks assembled controllably by cavity-microfibers demonstrate excellent large-scale and high-efficient water collection. To maximize the water-collecting capacity, nodes/intersections should be designed on the topology of the network as many as possible. Our light-weighted yet tough, low-cost microfibers with high efficiency in directional water transportation offers promising opportunities for large-scale water collection in water-deficient areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available