4.8 Article

Nanogrid single-nucleus RNA sequencing reveals phenotypic diversity in breast cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00244-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lefkofsky Family Foundation
  2. NCI [1RO1CA169244-01]
  3. American Cancer Society [129098-RSG-16-092-01-TBG]
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Swedish Cancer Society
  6. Soderberg Fellowship
  7. Sister Institution Network Grant (SINF) through the Global Access Program (GAP) at MD Anderson
  8. TL1 fellowship [TL1TR000369, UL1TR000371]
  9. American Legion Auxiliary fellowship
  10. Susan Komen Postdoctoral Fellowship [PDF17487910]
  11. AACR-John and Elizabeth Leonard Family Foundation Basic Cancer Research Fellowship [17-40-42-GAO]
  12. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Sequencing Core grant [CA016672 SMF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single cell RNA sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool for resolving transcriptional diversity in tumors, but is limited by throughput, cost and the ability to process archival frozen tissue samples. Here we develop a high-throughput 3' single-nucleus RNA sequencing approach that combines nanogrid technology, automated imaging, and cell selection to sequence up to similar to 1800 single nuclei in parallel. We compare the transcriptomes of 485 single nuclei to 424 single cells in a breast cancer cell line, which shows a high concordance (93.34%) in gene levels and abundance. We also analyze 416 nuclei from a frozen breast tumor sample and 380 nuclei from normal breast tissue. These data reveal heterogeneity in cancer cell phenotypes, including angiogenesis, proliferation, and stemness, and a minor subpopulation (19%) with many overexpressed cancer genes. Our studies demonstrate the utility of nanogrid single-nucleus RNA sequencing for studying the transcriptional programs of tumor nuclei in frozen archival tissue samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available