3.8 Review

Types of fiscal regime in hydrocarbon exploration and production

Journal

RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 45-53

Publisher

UNIV ZAGREB, FAC MINING, GEOLOGY & PETROLEUM ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.17794/rgn.2017.1.6

Keywords

fiscal regime; oil and gas business; production sharing agreement (PSA); services contract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The choice of the right fiscal regime represents the main object of the energy policy concerning hydrocarbon exploration and production for the state government. For the operator and service companies it represents the terms and conditions for practical conducting of the process in whole. This paper analyse aspects of agreements used in the petroleum industry. Elements of agreement, regardless of regime, have been described together with their advantages and disadvantages. Due to the fact that the fiscal regime has to be chosen to attract companies willing to invest in exploration and production, it represents a relevant part of the business strategy and also a base for the decision making process during start up. It has to minimize the risk for the both parties involved and maximize the state's share during the exploitation phase. For the companies, it has to be attractive enough to balance risks during the exploration phase with profits gained during the exploitation phase. The aim of this paper is to show the existing fis cal systems in the petroleum industry and to analyze the process for concluding a contract regarding the exploration and production of hydrocarbons. An overview of different business practices in the oil and gas industry with a detailed breakdown of the contract terms between the parties involved have been described in the paper. The aim of this paper is to show the different possibilities of financial regimes which could help during the negotiation process for conducting hydrocarbon exploration and production for everyone involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available