4.6 Article

Exposure to Farm Animals and Risk of Lung Cancer in the AGRICAN Cohort

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 4, Pages 463-472

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx125

Keywords

animal; cohort studies; farming; lung cancer; occupational exposure

Funding

  1. Ligue Contre le Cancer (Nationale and Comites du Calvados, de l'Orne, de la Manche, du Maine et Loire et de Paris)
  2. Mutualite Sociale Agricole (caisse centrale et caisses des Alpes du Nord, de l'Alsace, de Bourgogne, des Cotes Normandes, de Franche Comte, de Gironde, de Loire-Atlantique Vendee, de Midi Pyrenees Nord, de la Picardie)
  3. Fondation de France (Edouard Serres)
  4. Agence Nationale de Securite Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES)
  5. l'Office national de l'eau et des milieux aquatiques
  6. Institut National du Cancer [InCA 8422]
  7. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [ARC 02-010]
  8. Conseil Regional de Basse-Normandie
  9. Institut National de Medecine Agricole
  10. Centre Francois Baclesse
  11. European Regional Development Fund
  12. Cancer Research UK [11700, 18525] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiologic studies have found lower risks of lung cancer in farmers. However, little is known about the types of agricultural activities concerned. In the Agriculture and Cancer cohort, we assessed the relationship between animal farming and lung cancer by investigating the types of animals, tasks, and timing of exposure. Analyses included 170,834 participants from the Agriculture and Cancer (AGRICAN) cohort in France. Incident lung cancers were identified through linkage with cancer registries from enrollment (2005-2007) to 2011. A Cox model, adjusting for pack-years of cigarette smoking, was used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Lung cancer risk was inversely related to duration of exposure to cattle (>= 40 years: hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.41, 0.89; P for trend < 0.01) and to horse farming (>= 20 years: hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 1.17; P for trend = 0.09), especially for adenocarcinomas, but not with poultry or pig farming. More pronounced decreased risks were reported among individuals who had cared for animals, undertaken milking, and who had been exposed to cattle in infancy. Our study provides strong evidence of an inverse association between lung cancer and cattle and horse farming. Further research is warranted to identify the etiologic protective agents and biological mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available