4.8 Article

A Quasi-Input-Output model to improve the estimation of emission factors for purchased electricity from interconnected grids

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages 249-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.046

Keywords

Electricity trade; Embodied emissions; Network; Grid

Funding

  1. Dow Sustainability Fellows Program
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimating the embodied emissions in electricity has been a challenge due to the interconnectedness of electrical grids. Previous studies use a variety of methods that are often inaccurate or difficult to implement, lacking a standardized tool. We propose a method adapted from the economic input-output theory, which we term as Quasi-Input-Output (QIO) model, to evaluate embodied emissions in purchased electricity. The method takes into account the difference between the natures of trade in electricity and in goods and services, able to capture the effects of both direct and higher-order electricity transfers in the network. We use the Eurasian Continent grid network as a case, identifying regions where inter-grid electricity transfers, both direct and high-order, have sizable impacts on estimated emission factors of purchased electricity. Overall, while ignoring electricity trade can result in errors in embodied emissions estimation, directly adjusting for electricity trade (neglecting higher-order trade) tends to generate inaccuracies in the opposite direction. Our model can be potentially applied as a standard tool for the accounting of embodied emissions in purchased electricity in inter-grid electricity trade systems. It also provides a foundation for further applications of input-output theory in the analysis of demand-side drivers for environmental impacts of interconnected grids. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available