4.3 Article

Neurocognitive Impairment in a Chronically Well-Suppressed HIV-Infected Population: The Dutch TREVI Cohort Study

Journal

AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 329-334

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2017.0038

Keywords

HIV; HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; international HIV dementia scale; comorbidity

Funding

  1. Janssen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the value of screening for cognitive abnormalities in a chronically infected HIV population (N=388) and investigated the association with clinical correlates. The mean age was 48 years (+/- 11), the majority of the patients were male (89%), the median duration of infection was 6 years [interquartile range (IQR)=2-12], the median CD count was 600 (IQR=450-780), and 326 (84%) had a viral load below 200 copies/mL. Screening for cognitive complaints was applied using the three Simioni questions and the international HIV dementia scale (iHDS). Neuropsychological assessment (NPA) included 13 well-validated tests assessing motor speed, concentration, and memory. A total of 69 patients completed the NPA. CD4 (nadir), viral load, combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) duration, and the presence of comorbidities were evaluated for associations with NPA result. A total of 127 (33%) reported cognitive complaints during screening. The sensitivity and specificity of the Simioni questions were 82% and 24%, respectively. Adding the iHDS resulted in a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 73%. A CD4 nadir count <50 cells/m(3) was associated with an abnormal NPA (p=0.01). Comorbidities were more prevalent in patients with an abnormal NPA, although not statistically significant (p=0.276). Age, current CD4, viral load, and cART duration were not associated with abnormal NPA. The authors conclude that current screening strategies are insufficient in detecting HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. A low CD4 nadir is associated with poor neurocognitive outcome in HIV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available