4.8 Article

Evolution of AF6-RAS association and its implications in mixed-lineage leukemia

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01326-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Society (CRS)
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CCSRI)
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [FDN 143301]
  4. Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation
  5. Leukemia Lymphoma Society (LLS) of Canada
  6. National Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  7. MERST Quebec and Fonds de Recherche du Quebec (FRQ)-Nature et Technologie
  8. DFG [MA1876/11-1]
  9. CIHR studentship
  10. FRQ-Sante
  11. Canada Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elucidation of activation mechanisms governing protein fusions is essential for therapeutic development. MLL undergoes rearrangement with numerous partners, including a recurrent translocation fusing the epigenetic regulator to a cytoplasmic RAS effector, AF6/afadin. We show here that AF6 employs a non-canonical, evolutionarily conserved alpha-helix to bind RAS, unique to AF6 and the classical RASSF effectors. Further, all patients with MLL-AF6 translocations express fusion proteins missing only this helix from AF6, resulting in exposure of hydrophobic residues that induce dimerization. We provide evidence that oligomerization is the dominant mechanism driving oncogenesis from rare MLL translocation partners and employ our mechanistic understanding of MLL-AF6 to examine how dimers induce leukemia. Proteomic data resolve association of dimerized MLL with gene expression modulators, and inhibiting dimerization disrupts formation of these complexes while completely abrogating leukemogenesis in mice. Oncogenic gene translocations are thus selected under pressure from protein structure/function, underscoring the complex nature of chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available