4.7 Article

Automated calculation of udder depth and rear leg angle in Holstein-Friesian cows using a multi-Kinect cow scanning system

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 154-169

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.06.006

Keywords

Linear traits; Dairy cattle; Monitoring system; 3D object recognition

Funding

  1. Rinderzucht Schleswig-Holstein eG
  2. Stiftung Schleswig-Holsteinische Landschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low cost off-the-shelf depth sensors Microsoft Kinect have already been used in studies related to body condition determination and lameness detection in dairy cows and the concept of a 3D cow scanning by combining the fields of view of six Kinect cameras being presented. The cow scanner was developed in an effort to remove if possible, the influence of human operators from conformation recording by gathering data on linear descriptive traits using image analysis. In this study, a 3D object recognition pipeline was presented to automatically determine udder and rear leg of cows recorded in free walking. These body parts were then used to calculate the height of the udder bottom above ground and the rear leg angle. Between the manually gathered corresponding conformation recording scores and the calculated traits, medium to high Spearman rank correlation coefficients (0.63 for udder bottom height, 0.67 for rear leg angle) were observed. Between consecutive measurements, the calculating of udder bottom height was highly repeatable (76.9%) and the rear leg angle showed medium repeatability (47.4%) due to variance induced by the phase of the step. Both traits exhibited expected behaviour as udder bottom heights significantly decreased with increasing lactation number and rear legs were significantly straighter in cows with greater sacrum height. (C) 2017 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available