4.8 Article

Anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols enhance atmospheric heating

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15329

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)
  2. global environment research fund of the Japanese Ministry of the Environment [A-1101, 2-1403, 5-1605]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [15H05465, 16K16188, 15H02811]
  4. GRENE Arctic Climate Change Research Project
  5. Arctic Challenge for Sustainability (ArCS) project
  6. NIMS microstructural characterization platform as a program of the Nanotechnology Platform of MEXT, Japan
  7. Diamond Air Service Inc.
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01772, 15H05465, 15H02811, 16K16188, 26241003] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combustion-induced carbonaceous aerosols, particularly black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC), have been largely considered as the only significant anthropogenic contributors to shortwave atmospheric heating. Natural iron oxide (FeOx) has been recognized as an important contributor, but the potential contribution of anthropogenic FeOx is unknown. In this study, we quantify the abundance of FeOx over East Asia through aircraft measurements using a modified single-particle soot photometer. The majority of airborne FeOx particles in the continental outflows are of anthropogenic origin in the form of aggregated magnetite nanoparticles. The shortwave absorbing powers (P-abs) attributable to FeOx and to BC are calculated on the basis of their size-resolved mass concentrations and the mean P-abs(FeOx)/P-abs(BC) ratio in the continental outflows is estimated to be at least 4-7%. We demonstrate that in addition to carbonaceous aerosols the aggregate of magnetite nanoparticles is a significant anthropogenic contributor to shortwave atmospheric heating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available