4.3 Article

The association between the early motor repertoire and language development in term children born after normal pregnancy

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 30-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.05.006

Keywords

Early motor repertoire; General movements; Language development; Expressive language; Receptive language; Healthy term-born children

Funding

  1. Franz Lanyar Foundation
  2. Austrian Science Fund - FWF [P25241, P19581]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P19581, P25241] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 25241] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The assessment of the early motor repertoire is a widely used method for assessing the infant's neurological status. Aim: To determine the association between the early motor repertoire and language development. Study design: Prospective cohort study. Subjects: 22 term children born after normal pregnancy; video recorded for the assessment of the early motor repertoire including their motor optimality score (MOS), according to Prechtl, at 3 and 5 months post term. Outcome measures: At 4 years 7 months and 10 years 5 months, we tested the children's language performance by administering three tests for expressive language and two for receptive language. Results: Smooth and fluent movements at 3 months of age was associated with better expressive language outcome at both 4 years 7 months and 10 years 5 months (betas 0.363 and 0.628). A higher MOS at 5 months was associated with better expressive language at both ages (betas 0.486 and 0.628). The item postural patterns at 5 months was the only aspect associated with poorer expressive language outcome (beta - 0.677). Conclusion: Predominantly, qualitative aspects of the early motor repertoire at the age of 3 and 5 months are associated with language development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available