4.6 Article

Experimental ladder proof of Hardy's nonlocality for high-dimensional quantum systems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474238, 91636109]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities at Xiamen University [20720160040]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China for Distinguished Young Scientists [2015J06002]
  4. program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-13-0495]
  5. Banting postdoctoral fellowship of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Canada Research Chairs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have witnessed a rapidly growing interest in high-dimensional quantum entanglement for fundamental studies as well as towards novel applications. Therefore, the ability to verify entanglement between physical qudits, d-dimensional quantum systems, is of crucial importance. To show nonclassicality, Hardy's paradox represents the best version of Bell's theorem without using inequalities. However, so far it has only been tested experimentally for bidimensional vector spaces. Here, we formulate a theoretical framework to demonstrate the ladder proof of Hardy's paradox for arbitrary high-dimensional systems. Furthermore, we experimentally demonstrate the ladder proof by taking advantage of the orbital angular momentum of high-dimensionally entangled photon pairs. We perform the ladder proof of Hardy's paradox for dimensions 3 and 4, both with the ladder up to the third step. Our paper paves the way towards a deeper understanding of the nature of high-dimensionally entangled quantum states and may find applications in quantum information science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available