4.4 Article

Telomere length is correlated with mitochondrial DNA copy number in intestinal, but not diffuse, gastric cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 925-929

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6197

Keywords

gastric cancer; mitochondria DNA copy number; telomere; intestinal type; diffuse type

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education [NRF-2014R1A6A3A04058057]
  2. Korean Government [2014R1A5A2010008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A positive correlation between telomere length and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number has previously been observed in healthy individuals, and in patients with psychiatric disorders. In the present study, telomere length and mtDNA copy number were evaluated in gastric cancer (GC) tissue samples. DNA was extracted from 109 GC samples (including 82 intestinal, and 27 diffuse cases), and the telomere length and mtDNA copy number were analyzed using a quantitative-polymerase chain reaction assay. The relative telomere length and mtDNA copy number in tumor tissue, as compared with in normal tissue, (mean standard deviation) in all GC samples were 11.48 +/- 1.14 and +/- 14.861.35, respectively. Telomere length and mtDNA copy number were not identified as exhibiting clinical or prognostic value for GC. However, positive correlations between telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number were identified in GC (r=0.408, P<0.001) and in the adjacent normal mucosa (r=0.363; P<0.001). When stratified by Lauren classification, the correlation was identified in intestinal type GC samples (r=0.461; P<0.001), but not in diffuse type GC samples (r=0.225; P=0.260). This result indicated that loss of the correlation of telomeres and mitochondrial function may induce the initiation or progression of GC pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available