4.5 Article

Functional dependence underlies a positive plant-grasshopper richness relationship

Journal

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 94-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.001

Keywords

Ozarks; Glades; Indirect relationships; Herbivores

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-0947432]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [2012149884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central focus of ecology is identifying the factors that shape spatial patterns of species diversity and this is particularly relevant in an era of global change. Positive relationships between plant and consumer diversity are common, but could be driven by direct responses of each trophic level to underlying environmental gradients, or indirectly where changes in environmental conditions propagate through food webs. Here we use structural equation modeling to examine the relative importance of soil resource availability and disturbance (fire) in mediating relationships between plant and grasshopper richness in insular grasslands. We found a positive relationship between plant and consumer richness that became stronger after accounting for disturbance, despite unique responses of plants and consumers to the two environmental gradients, Plant richness responded to an underlying gradient: in soil resource availability. Time since the last fire had a direct positive effect on grasshopper richness but had no effect on plant richness. This work supports that plant and consumer richness are functionally linked, rather than having similar responses to environmental gradients, :By disentangling the direct and indirect processes underlying a positive :relationship between plant and consumer diversity in a :natural system that spans multiple environmental gradients, we demonstrate the importance of investigating biodiversity through explicit multivariate models. (C) 2017 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All :rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available