3.8 Proceedings Paper

Distance Distributions in Finite Ad Hoc Networks: Approaches, Applications, and Directions

Journal

AD HOC NETWORKS, ADHOCNETS 2016
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 167-179

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51204-4_14

Keywords

Wireless ad hoc networks; Performance metrics; Distance distributions

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. CFI
  3. BCKDF
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571370]
  5. National Civil Aircraft Major Project of China [MIZ-2015-F-009]
  6. Ministry of Educations Key Lab for Computer Network and Information Integration at Southeast University, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most performance metrics in wireless ad hoc networks, such as interference, Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio, path loss, outage probability, link capacity, node degree, hop count, network coverage, and connectivity, are nonlinear functions of the distances among communicating, relaying, and interfering nodes. A probabilistic distance-based model is definitely needed in quantifying these metrics, which eventually involves the Nodal Distance Distribution (NDD) in a finite network intrinsically depending on the network coverage and nodal spatial distribution. In general, there are two types of NDD, i.e., (1) Ref2Ran: the distribution of the distance between a given reference node and a node uniformly distributed at random, and (2) Ran2Ran: the distribution of the distance between two nodes uniformly distributed at random. Traditionally, ad hoc networks were modeled as rectangles or disks. Recently, both types of NDD have been extended to the networks in the shape of one or multiple arbitrary polygons, such as convex, concave, disjoint, or tiered networks. In this paper, we survey the state-of-the-art approaches to the two types of NDD with uniform or nonuniform node distributions and their applications in wireless ad hoc networks, as well as discussing the open issues, challenges, and future research directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available