4.6 Article

Nonlinear algorithm of PEM fuel cell catalyst poisoning progress in the presence of carbon monoxide in anode fuel: A computational study using OpenFOAM

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages 348-364

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.021

Keywords

carbon monoxide tolerant; oxygen bleeding; purge condition; degradation nonlinear progress algorithm; CO tolerance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a model to theoretically study the key poisoning-related concepts including Dimensionless Cell Voltage (DCV), nonlinear algorithm of poisoning progress, smooth and accelerated poisoning progress regions, intensification point, and the rate of poisoning progress. A 3-D multicomponent transient solver, based on a comprehensive mathematical model including reaction kinetics, governing equations, boundary conditions and constitutive relations, in the open source code package, OpenFOAM, has been developed that has the capability of simulating anode side of PEM fuel cell in poisoning condition. This study suggests an optimum parametric voltage range for choosing purge characteristics of fuel cells operated in dead ended mode as well as an optimum range of efficient oxygen bleeding that must be used to cure or prevent CO poisoning. Studying the effects of key operating conditions on the poisoning progress algorithm showed that increasing the CO concentration, current density and operating temperature, and also lowering the catalyst Pt loading can all reduce the poisoning period and speed up its progress rate. The results also showed that poisoning progress follows a nonlinear algorithm. Based on the Response Surface Method (RSM), a series of parametric correlations were extracted to predict the poisoning progress algorithm according to above-mentioned operating conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available