4.5 Article

Geometrical and magnetic structure of iron oxide clusters (FeO)n for n > 1 0

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 134-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.028

Keywords

Iron oxide clusters; Polarizability; Spin magnetic moment; Cage structures; Chemisorption on surfaces

Funding

  1. Office of Science of U.S. Department of Energy [DE-ACO2-05CH11231]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [OIA-1541079]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office of Integrative Activities [1541079] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure and properties of stoichiometric iron oxide clusters (FeO)(n) are computed using all-electron density functional theory (DFT) for n > 10. The structures of (FeO)(11), (FeO)(13), (FeO)(14), (FeO)(15), and (FeO)(16) clusters are reported for the first time. Their lowest total energy states are found to possess spin multiplicities of 5, 5, 47, 27, and 15, respectively. The geometrical structure of the lowest total energy state of a (FeO)(n) cluster corresponds to chemisorption of oxygen atoms on the surface of the corresponding unary Fe-n cluster when n > 12. Computed properties of the iron oxide clusters are compared to the properties of the corresponding bare iron clusters. The average binding energy per atom of a (FeO)(n) cluster is substantially larger than that of Fe-n at all n. Surprisingly, the values of both polarizability and binding energy per atom of the iron oxide clusters change insignificantly when n increases from two to 16. In order to compare the performance of DFT methods in the iron and iron oxide series, the states of Fe-8 and (FeO)(8) were computed using five exchange-correlation functionals in the whole range of possible spin multiplicities. It is found that the results of computations of the (FeO)(8) cluster are more sensitive to the choice of a DFT functional than those of the Fe-8 cluster. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available