4.7 Article

Anion inhibitors of the β-carbonic anhydrase from the pathogenic bacterium responsible of tularemia, Francisella tularensis

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages 4800-4804

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.07.033

Keywords

Carbonic anhydrase; beta-Class; CA inhibitors; Anions; Francisella tularensis; Tularemia

Funding

  1. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2010-261460]
  2. Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  3. Australian Research Council [DP160102681]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A beta-class carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) from the pathogenic bacterium Francisella tularensis (Ftu beta CA) was cloned and purified, and the anion inhibition profile was investigated. Based on the measured kinetic parameters for the enzyme catalyzed CO2 hydration reaction (k(cat) of 9.8 x 10(5) s(-1) and a loot/K-M of 8.9 x 10(7) M-1 s(-1)), Ftu beta CA is a highly effective enzyme. The activity of Ftu beta CA was not inhibited by a range of anions that do not typically coordinate Zn(II) effectively, including perchlorate, tetrafluoroborate, and hexafluorophosphate. Surprisingly, some anions which generally complex well with many cations, including Zn(II), also did not effectively inhibit FtuBCA, e.g., fluoride, cyanide, azide, nitrite, bisulphite, sulfate, tellurate, perrhenate, perrhuthenate, and peroxydisulfate. However, the most effective inhibitors were in the range of 90-94 tiM (sulfamide, sulfamic acid, phenylarsonic and phenylboronic acid). N,N-Diethyldithiocarbamate (K-I of 0.31 mM) was a moderately potent inhibitor. As Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia, the discovery of compounds that can interfere with the life cycle of this pathogen may result in novel opportunities to fight antibiotic drug resistance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available