4.7 Article

Volatile organic compounds within indoor environments in Australia

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 116-125

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.033

Keywords

Volatile organic compounds; Indoor air quality; Formaldehyde; BTEX; Terpenes

Funding

  1. Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub at the University of Melbourne, through the Australian Department of the Environment and Energy
  2. CSIRO Land and Water
  3. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (Climate Science Centre)
  4. Centre for Air quality and health Research and evaluation (CAR), an NHRMC Centre of Research Excellence
  5. Australian Department of Education and Training (Australian Postgraduate Award)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are pervasive indoor air pollutants. This paper systematically evaluates 25 years (1991-2016) of investigations of VOCs within indoor environments in Australia. Among 31 papers evaluated, the most frequently studied environment was domestic housing (61%), and the most frequently quantified compound was formaldehyde (81%). Active sampling techniques were used in 82% of studies of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), and in 38% of studies of formaldehyde and other carbonyls. New homes had the highest VOC levels among all studies of domestic housing. For nearly all pollutants, indoor levels were several times higher than outdoor levels. Among the most prevalent compounds indoors were terpenes, such as d-limonene and alpha-pinene. All studies were conducted at a regional or local level, and no study reported statistically representative indoor VOC data for the Australian. population. The evaluation revealed a diversity of sampling approaches and techniques, pointing to the importance of a standard approach for collecting and reporting data. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available