4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Training in Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resections: a paradigm shift away from See one, Do one, Teach one

Journal

HPB
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 234-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VA
  2. Ethicon
  3. Alliance of Families Fighting Pancreatic Cancer
  4. Griffith Family Foundation
  5. Project Purple
  6. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
  7. Providence Health and Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increased incorporation of minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) has emerged into hepato-pancreato-biliary practice, however, no standardization exists for its safe adoption. Novel strategies are presented for dissemination of safe MIPR. Methods: An international State-of-the-Art conference evaluating multiple aspects of MIPR was conducted by a panel of pancreas experts in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 20, 2016. Training and education issues were discussed regarding the introduction of novel strategies for safe dissemination of MIPR. Results: The low volume of pancreatic resections per institution poses a challenge for surgeons to overcome their MIPR learning curve without deliberate training. A mastery-based simulation and biotissue curriculum can improve technical proficiency and allow for training of surgeons before the operating room. Video-based platforms allow for performance reporting and feedback necessary for coaching and surgical quality improvement. Centers of excellence with training involving a standardized approach and proctorship are important concepts that can be utilized in various formats internationally. Discussion: Surgical volume is not sufficient to ensure quality and patient safety in MIPR. Safe adoption of these complex procedures should consider innovative mastery-based training outside of the operating room, novel video based coaching techniques and prospective reporting of patient data and outcomes using standardized definitions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available