4.6 Article

Glucagon's effect on liver protein metabolism in vivo

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00045.2017

Keywords

liver; glucagon; amino acid metabolism

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [RO1-DK-43706]
  2. NIDDK [DK-20593, DK-059637]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The postprandial state is characterized by a storage of nutrients in the liver, muscle, and adipose tissue for later utilization. In the case of a protein-rich meal, amino acids (AA) stimulate glucagon secretion by the alpha-cell. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the rise in glucagon on AA metabolism, particularly in the liver. We used a conscious catheterized dog model to recreate a postprandial condition using a pancreatic clamp. Portal infusions of glucose, AA, and insulin were used to achieve postprandial levels, while portal glucagon infusion was either maintained at the basal level or increased by three-fold. The high glucagon infusion reduced the increase in arterial AA concentrations compared with the basal glucagon level (-23%, P < 0.05). In the presence of high glucagon, liver AA metabolism shifted toward a more catabolic state with less protein synthesis (- 36%) and increased urea production (+ 52%). Net hepatic glucose uptake was reduced modestly (- 35%), and AA were preferentially used in gluconeogenesis, leading to lower glycogen synthesis (- 54%). The phosphorylation of AMPK was increased by the high glucagon infusion (+ 40%), and this could be responsible for increasing the expression of genes related to pathways producing energy and lowering those involved in energy consumption. In conclusion, the rise in glucagon associated with a protein-rich meal promotes a catabolic utilization of AA in the liver, thereby, opposing the storage of AA in proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available