4.5 Article

Reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages 926-932

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13465

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stichting Rotterdams Kinderrevalidatie Fonds Adriaanstichting and Johanna KinderFonds (the Netherlands)
  2. Stiftelsen Frimurare-Barnhuset
  3. Strategic Research Funding for Health Care Science (SFO-V)
  4. Sunnerdahl foundation (Sweden)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo investigate the interrater and test-retest reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents (Ad-AHA) with cerebral palsy (CP) and to evaluate the alternate-form reliability of different test activities. MethodParticipants were 112 adolescents with unilateral CP (60 males, 52 females; mean age 14y 5mo [standard deviation {SD} 2y 8mo], Manual Ability Classification System levels I-III). Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), smallest detectable change (SDC), and Bland-Altman plots. ResultsICCs for interrater (n=38) and test-retest reliability (n=31) were excellent: 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) respectively. The alternate-form reliability of different test activities was excellent for children (age 10-12y, n=30) performing the School-Kids AHA and Ad-AHA Board Game 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) and for adolescents (age 13-18y) performing the Ad-AHA Board Game compared to the Ad-AHA Present (n=28) 0.99 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), or the Ad-AHA Sandwich (n=29) 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) tasks. SDC for test-retest was 4.5 AHA-units. InterpretationAd-AHA scores are consistent across different raters and occasions. The good alternate-form reliability indicates that the different test activities can be used interchangeably in adolescents with unilateral CP. Differences greater than or equal to 5 AHA-units can be considered a change beyond measurement error. The use of logit based AHA-units makes change comparable for persons at different ability levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available