4.7 Article

Flexural stress and crack sensing capabilities of MWNT/cement composites

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 86-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.078

Keywords

Stress sensing, crack sensing; multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWNT); Electrically conductive cement composites; Piezoresistive sensing

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2015R1A2A1A10055694]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flexural stress/crack sensing capabilities of multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWNT)/cement composite sensors were investigated in this study. The electrical/mechanical characteristics of the composites were explored with respect to the MWNT contents, prior to evaluating the sensing capabilities of the composites. A dramatic increase (over three orders) in the electrical conductivity, compressive and flexural strength (36% and 18%) were observed in the composite specimens. The sensing capabilities of the composites were evaluated by monitoring the electrical resistance change of the composites under loading. The composites subjected to flexural stress showed higher sensing capability as the MWNT content was increased. Both stress and crack sensing capability were enhanced with the increase of MWNT content. In addition, the examination demonstrated that an embedment of MWNT content of 0.6 wt% resulted in the best sensing capabilities. Lastly, the composites were embedded in two different locations of reinforced mortar beams for in-situ monitoring of electrical resistance. A dramatic change in the resistance of the composites were accompanied at failure of the mortar, regardless of the sensor location. The obtained result may have implications for the use of the composites as a stress/crack sensor in cement based composite structures. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available