4.4 Article

Strengths and limitations of coronary angiography with turbo high-pitch third-generation dual-source CT

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 9, Pages 739-744

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To define practical limitations of diagnostic image quality for recently introduced turbo high-pitch scan mode (THP) in third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients undergoing CT coronary angiography were included in this retrospective single-centre analysis. A contrast-enhanced volume dataset was acquired in THP. Image quality of coronary segments was classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic by three blinded readers. Segments were stated as non-diagnostic if at least one of three readers could neither exclude nor confirm significant stenoses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess relationships between number of non-diagnostic segments and common influencing factors. RESULTS: Median effective radiation dose was 0.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.4-0.8) mSv overall and 0.3 (IQR, 0.3-0.4) mSv in the 70 kV subgroup of this middle aged, predominantly pre-obese cohort (age: 61 [IQR, 52-67] years; body mass index [BMI]: 26 [IQR, 23-29] kg/m(2)) with a low-moderate median Agatston score (AS) 0 (IQR, 0-70). Diagnostic image quality was found in 98.1% of 3,678 coronary segments. AS was independently associated with diagnostic image quality (B=0.34; p=0.02), whereas heart rate, BMI, and presence of arrhythmia were not. The portion of diagnostic coronary segments decreased slightly in obese patients with heart rates >65 beats/min and dropped significantly in patients with an AS >600 (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: THP enables CT coronary angiography with minimal radiation exposure and is most appropriate in non-obese patients with stable sinus rhythm <= 65 beats/min and a calcium score <= 600. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available