4.7 Article

Surface properties and surface free energy of cellulosic etc mucoadhesive polymers

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 152-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.019

Keywords

Mucoadhesive polymers; Drug delivery systems; Contact angle; Sorption of powders; IGC technique; Surface energy

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DS-PB/0701, DS-PB/0700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents the sorption and wettability properties for several mucoadhesive polymers (Carbopol 974P NF (carbomer polymer; carboxy polymethylene), Noveon AA-1, (polycarbophil; acrylic acid polymer crosslinked with divinyl glycol) HPMC (hypromellose; cellulose 2-hydroxyethyl methyl ester) and HEC (cellulose 2-hydroxyethyl ether) and a film-forming polymer Kollidon VA 64 (polyvinylpyrrolidonevinyl acetate copolymer)) commonly used in controlled drug delivery systems. Moreover, the surface energy of powders was determined using the data obtained according to the three types of experimental investigation. The contact angle measurements for powders were performed according to the Washburn method and using the capillary rise technique. Whereas the sessile drop method was performed on the compressed discs of mucoadhesive polymers. For the surface characterization the IGC technique was also applied. The results obtained by different methods, for both: wettability and surface energies, were compared and correlated. The presented study showed significant differences in the morphology and surface properties of mucoadhesion polymers considered. It was confirmed that for the accurate quantification of the free surface energy (and its components), for mucoadhesive polymers considered, not only the IGC in finite concentration, but also the Washburn method should be used. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available