3.8 Review

Laboratory spectra of hot molecules: Data needs for hot super-Earth exoplanets

Journal

MOLECULAR ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 1-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molap.2017.05.002

Keywords

Super-Earth; Lava-planets; Absorption Intensities; FTIR spectroscopy; Line lists; Transit spectroscopy; Exoplanets

Funding

  1. ERC under the Advanced Investigator Project [267219]
  2. UK Science and Technology Research Council (STFC) [ST/M001334/1]
  3. STFC
  4. BIS
  5. COST action MOLIM [CM1405]
  6. STFC [ST/P000673/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/M001334/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/L000636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P000673/1, ST/L000636/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/M001334/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of stars are now thought to support exoplanets. Many of those exoplanets discovered thus far are categorized as rocky objects with an atmosphere. Most of these objects are however hot due to their short orbital period. Models suggest that water is the dominant species in their atmospheres. The hot temperatures are expected to turn these atmospheres into a (high pressure) steam bath containing remains of melted rock. The spectroscopy of these hot rocky objects will be very different from that of cooler objects or hot gas giants. Molecules suggested to be important for the spectroscopy of these objects are reviewed together with the current status of the corresponding spectroscopic data. Perspectives of building a comprehensive database of linelist/cross sections applicable for atmospheric models of rocky super-Earths as part of the ExoMol project are discussed. The quantum-mechanical approaches used in linelist productions and their challenges are summarized. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available