3.8 Review

Opening the debate on MRI practitioner education - Is there a need for change?

Journal

RADIOGRAPHY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages S70-S74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.12.011

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Education; Specialism; Specialist education; Radiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) practitioners are traditionally radiographers who learn MRI experientially. This review opens the debate on whether this is the best way of learning MRI. It was conducted as part of a study exploring the value of direct-entry into MRI via a specialized undergraduate degree without first qualifying as a radiographer. Method: A narrative literature review using the search terms MRI, radiography education and specialist education (healthcare, radiography). Findings: There is a lack of cohesive policy on how to educate imaging specialists. There is evidence that MRI practitioners lack knowledge and that current educational methods are failing. Direct entry via a specialized undergraduate degree is permitted in some countries, and research suggests that this is a beneficial way of learning MRI. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available