4.6 Article

Notes for genera: Ascomycota

Journal

FUNGAL DIVERSITY
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 1-594

Publisher

SPRINGER

Keywords

Article 59; Classification; One name; Pleomorphic fungi; Taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [RSA5980068]
  2. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) [60201000201]
  3. Mae Fah Luang University [592010200112]
  4. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT), Chile [11140562]
  5. Programa de Salud Animal y Vegetal [P131LH003033]
  6. Key Laboratory of Yunnan Province Universities of the Diversity and Ecological Adaptive Evolution for Animals and plants on Yun-Gui Plateau
  7. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [105-2621-B-019 -002-]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570019]
  9. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD./0072/2553]
  10. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [26291084, 16K07474]
  11. Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-16-4-IV]
  12. Yunnan Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security [179122]
  13. International Scientific Partnership Program ISPP at King Saud University [0089]
  14. SERB, DST, Government of India [YSS/2015/001590]
  15. Swedish Research Council [VR 621-2012-3990, VR 2016-03589]
  16. Biosystems and Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI) [FCT/UID/Multi/04046/2013]
  17. Italian National Program for Antarctic Researches (PNRA)
  18. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
  19. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K07474, 15H04491, 26291084] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the relationships and thus the classification of fungi, has developed rapidly with increasingly widespread use of molecular techniques, over the past 10-15 years, and continues to accelerate. Several genera have been found to be polyphyletic, and their generic concepts have subsequently been emended. New names have thus been introduced for species which are phylogenetically distinct from the type species of particular genera. The ending of the separate naming of morphs of the same species in 2011, has also caused changes in fungal generic names. In order to facilitate access to all important changes, it was desirable to compile these in a single document. The present article provides a list of generic names of Ascomycota (approximately 6500 accepted names published to the end of 2016), including those which are lichen-forming. Notes and summaries of the changes since the last edition of 'Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi' in 2008 are provided. The notes include the number of accepted species, classification, type species (with location of the type material), culture availability, life-styles, distribution, and selected publications that have appeared since 2008. This work is intended to provide the foundation for updating the ascomycete component of the Without prejudice list of generic names of Fungi'' published in 2013, which will be developed into a list of protected generic names. This will be subjected to the XIXth International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen in July 2017 agreeing to a modification in the rules relating to protected lists, and scrutiny by procedures determined by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). The previously invalidly published generic names Barriopsis, Collophora (as Collophorina), Cryomyces, Dematiopleospora, Heterospora (as Heterosporicola), Lithophila, Palmomyces (as Palmaria) and Saxomyces are validated, as are two previously invalid family names, Bartaliniaceae and Wiesneriomycetaceae. Four species of Lalaria, which were invalidly published are transferred to Taphrina and validated as new combinations. Catenomycopsis Tibell & Constant. is reduced under Chaenothecopsis Vain., while Dichomera Cooke is reduced under Botryosphaeria Ces. & De Not. (Art. 59).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available