4.8 Article

Targeting Adenosine in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Reduces Tumor Growth and Metastasis

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 77, Issue 17, Pages 4684-4696

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0393

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellowship [1078671]
  2. NHMRC [1120887]
  3. Cancer Research Institute Clinical Strategy Team Grant
  4. Cancer Council Queensland Ph.D. fellowship
  5. NHMRC C.J. Martin Fellowship [1111469]
  6. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship [ALTF 945-2015]
  7. European Commission (Marie Curie Action LTFCOFUND) [GA-2013-609409]
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1111469, 1120887] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence exists for the role of immunosuppressive adenosine in promoting tumor growth and spread in a number of cancer types, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we assessed whether the CD73-adenosinergic pathway is active in melanoma patients and whether adenosine restricts the efficacy of clinically approved targeted therapies for commonly mutated BRAF(V600E) melanoma. In AJCC stage III melanoma patients, CD73 expression (the enzyme that generates adenosine) correlated significantly with patients presenting nodal metastatic melanoma, suggesting that targeting this pathway may be effective in advanced stage disease. In addition, dabrafenib and trametinib treatment of CD73(+) BRAF(V600E)-mutant melanomas caused profound CD73 downregulation in tumor cells. Inhibition of BRAF and MEK in combination with the A2A adenosine receptor provided significant protection against tumor initiation and metastasis formation in mice. Our results suggest that targeting adenosine may enhance therapeutic responses for melanoma patients receiving targeted or immune-based therapies. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available