4.5 Article

Structural characterization of the immunostimulatory exopolysaccharide produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides strain NTM048

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
Volume 448, Issue -, Pages 95-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2017.06.004

Keywords

Leuconostoc mesenteroides NTM048; Exopolysaccharide; Adjuvant; Structural analysis; NMR

Funding

  1. Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation
  2. Mitani Foundation for Research and Development
  3. Towa Foundation for Food Science Research
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [26293111, 16H01373]
  5. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  6. Nitto Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293111, 16H01373] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides strain NTM048 has been reported to be an immunostimulant that enhances mucosal IgA production. In this study, we found that intranasal administration of mice with the EPS and an antigen (ovalbumin) resulted in secretion of antigen-specific IgA and IgG in the airway mucosa and the serum, suggesting that the EPS has the adjuvant activity for use with mucosal vaccination. Methylation analysis coupled to GC MS, and 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy revealed that 94% of the EPS consists of an alpha-(1 -> 6) glucan containing 4% of 1 -> 3-linked alpha-glucose branches. To determine structures of minor components, we enzymatically digested the glucan with dextranase and used 2D NMR spectroscopy to identify the remaining polymer as a fructan (or fructans), containing both beta-(2 -> 6)- and beta-(2 -> 1)-linked fructofuranose residues. These residues may either enter into separate polymers of each linkage type or form a mixed fructan containing both linkage types. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available