4.3 Article

Differential effect of extracellular matrix derived from papillary and reticular fibroblasts on epidermal development in vitro

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 237-246

Publisher

JOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2017.2984

Keywords

extracellular matrix; fibroblast; human skin equivalent; papillary; reticular

Categories

Funding

  1. CHANEL Parfum Beaute, Paris, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Papillary and reticular fibroblasts have different effects on keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether these effects are caused by differential secretion of soluble factors or by differential generation of extracellular matrix from papillary and reticular fibroblasts. Materials & Methods: To study the effect of soluble factors, keratinocyte monolayer cultures were grown in papillary or reticular fibroblast-conditioned medium. To study the effect of extracellular matrix, keratinocytes were grown on papillary or reticular-derived matrix. Results: Conditioned medium from papillary or reticular fibroblasts did not differentially affect keratinocyte viability or epidermal development. However, keratinocyte viability was increased when grown on matrix derived from papillary, compared with reticular, fibroblasts. In addition, the longevity of the epidermis was increased when cultured on papillary fibroblast-derived matrix skin equivalents compared with reticular-derived matrix skin equivalents. Conclusion: The findings indicate that the matrix secreted by papillary and reticular fibroblasts is the main causal factor to account for the differences in keratinocyte growth and viability observed in our study. Differences in response to soluble factors between both populations were less significant. Matrix components specific to the papillary dermis may account for the preferential growth of keratinocytes on papillary dermis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available