4.4 Article

Microbubble detection and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 9, Pages 772-779

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [AO92595]
  2. Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit (CCTU)
  3. Cambridge and Huntingdon Breast Screening Service
  4. Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust (ACT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIMS: To assess the feasibility of undertaking microbubble-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) and determine its sensitivity in detecting metastases. Patient experience and the impact of VAB on subsequent axillary surgery were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a normal axillary ultrasound or benign core biopsy planned for surgical SLN biopsy were recruited. Part 1 of the study was used to establish the technique of ultrasound microbubble contrast to detect the SLN. In Part 2 microbubble detection of the SLN was followed by 13 G VAB. All patients subsequently had surgical histological correlation. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were recruited: 36 to Part 1 and 103 to Part 2. Of the 100 patients in Part 2 included for analysis, 82 (82%) underwent successful biopsy. Sensitivity for detecting metastases was 58.8% (95% confidence interval: 32.9%, 81.6%). The procedure was generally well tolerated; however, VAB interfered adversely with subsequent surgical SLN biopsy with surgeons reporting moderate or severe interference in 48% of patients and an additional 8.3% with complete failure of SLNB. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform VAB of microbubble-detected SLNs. Although the sensitivity for detecting metastases was reasonable, the adverse effect on subsequent surgery was significant. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available