Journal
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 245-277Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-017-9356-x
Keywords
Social; Environmental; Sustainability; Policy communication; Choice; Mixed methods
Categories
Funding
- Transformative Consumer Research Grant - Association for Consumer Research (ACR)
- Sheth Foundation
- California State University, Sacramento
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Prior research on sustainable consumption has addressed a variety of issues yet is characterized by mixed results. Researchers have often treated sustainability as a uni-dimensional construct, overlooking important differences and thwarting a better understanding of consumer response. We demonstrate that consumers perceive the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability as psychologically distinct in theoretically and practically important ways. Specifically, consumers associate the social dimension of sustainability more with affective, short-term, and local considerations and the environmental dimension more with cognitive, long-term, and global considerations. We identify and explore these distinctions in a qualitative pilot study, which subsequently motivated development of three hypotheses. We provide evidence supporting these hypotheses in a series of five studies. Our findings enable a reinterpretation of prior equivocal research, serve as a foundation for future research, and provide guidance for how policy-makers can tailor policy and related communication efforts depending on whether the focal issue is related to social versus environmental concerns.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available