4.7 Article

Hall-Fetch relationship for austenitic stainless steels processed by large strain warm rolling

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 39-48

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.060

Keywords

Stainless steels; Thermo-mechanical processing; Grain refinement; Strain hardening; Structure-property relationship

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  2. Russian Federation [16-38-50134]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.A 12.31.0001]
  4. Increased Competitiveness Program of NUST MISiS [K2-2016-062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deformation microstructures and their effect on the yield strength of austenitic stainless steels processed by large strain warm rolling were studied. The samples of 304 L and 316 L type steels were subjected to caliber bar rolling to total strains of 2 at temperatures of 773-1173 K. The structural changes were characterized by the development of continuous dynamic recrystallization. A decrease in the rolling temperature resulted in significant grain/subgrain refinement and an increase in the yield strength at room and elevated temperatures. A power law function was obtained between the deformation grain and subgrain sizes with a grain size exponent of 0.3. Therefore, the yield strength could be expressed by a modified Hall-Petch relationship including a term of substructural strengthening, which was evaluated using the obtained size relation. The numerical factors normalized by shear modulus for both structural and substructural strengthening terms depended quite weakly on tensile test temperature in the range of 293-873 K that suggested the deformation mechanisms being invariant up to 873 K. On the other hand, the thermally activated mechanisms led to the yield strength decreasing much faster than shear modulus as the tensile test temperature increased above 873 K. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available