4.1 Review

Epilepsy and osteoporosis risk

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000366

Keywords

antiepileptic drugs; bone density; fracture; osteoporosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewIt is well-recognized that individuals with epilepsy have an increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; this increased risk has been described to be secondary to an increased bone fragility and to an increased risk of falls. Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease which has been characterized by microarchitectural deterioration of trabecula and cortical bone mass with a decrease in bone mineral density and bone strength. Specific side effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on bone metabolism have been identified; recent research publications further characterized some of the specific side effects of AEDs on bone metabolism. It is the purpose of this review to describe recent advances on the knowledge of the effects of AEDs on bone metabolism and the cause of osteoporosis in the field of epilepsy.Recent findingsRecent literature demonstrates that the increased risk of fractures in the epileptic patient population is likely multifactorial and includes seizure activity, injuries from falls, decreased bone strength, adverse effects from AEDs. Reviewed publications suggest that the mechanism of adverse effects on bone metabolism may differ among different AEDs. The impact of vitamin D deficiency or its metabolism in the epileptic population has also been a concern of several reviewed publications.SummaryThis is a review is of the recent epilepsy and osteoporosis literature published over the past 18 months, highlighting reports and studies concerning the cause, pathogenesis, and possible preventive measures and effects of AEDs on changes of bone metabolism, bone loss, and development of osteoporosis. In addition, we also reviewed articles focusing on issues of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in individuals with epilepsy. We utilized the search engines of PubMed and Cochrane Reviews from January 2016 to June 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available