4.2 Article

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Trajectories in a Diverse Longitudinal Cohort

Journal

CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 82-93

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1282911

Keywords

Aging; cognitive decline; dementia; education; income

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000002, UL1 TR001860] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG054076, K01 AG052646, P30 AG010129, P30 AG043097] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Although individual-level socioeconomic status is associated with poor outcomes, less is known regarding how the social context might affect cognitive outcomes. We examined the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) on baseline cognitive function and trajectories of decline.Methods: The sample (N=480) came from a longitudinal cohort recruited to study cognitive function. Mixed effects models examined the influence of NSES on baseline and rate of change in executive function, semantic memory, and episodic memory.Results: NSES was positively associated with semantic memory scores at baseline, but not with executive function or episodic memory in adjusted models, nor was it associated with cognitive change in longitudinal analyses. In exploratory analyses, for individuals with dementia, those with higher NSES declined faster in executive function and semantic memory than did those with lower NSES.Conclusions: Results suggest that NSES has limited effects independent of personal characteristics; however, findings showed a complex relation of NSES and decline, with NSES effects observed only for individuals with dementia. Results are discussed in the context of cognitive reserve.Clinical Implications: Clinical assessments of individuals who present with cognitive impairment might benefit from an understanding of the neighborhood context from which patients come.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available