4.7 Review

The role of nutritional support in the physical and functional recovery of critically ill patients: a narrative review

Journal

CRITICAL CARE
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1810-2

Keywords

Nutrition; Critical illness; Physical recovery; Energy; Protein

Funding

  1. Health Education England (HEE)/National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [ICA-CDRF-2015-01047]
  2. NIHR [PDF-2015-08-015]
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  4. NHS Research Scotland (NRS)
  5. Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust
  6. University of Southampton
  7. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PDF-2015-08-015] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  8. National Institute for Health Research [PDF-2015-08-015] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of benefit from randomised controlled trials has resulted in significant controversy regarding the role of nutrition during critical illness in terms of long-term recovery and outcome. Although methodological caveats with a failure to adequately appreciate biological mechanisms may explain these disappointing results, it must be acknowledged that nutritional support during early critical illness, when considered alone, may have limited long-term functional impact. This narrative review focuses specifically on recent clinical trials and evaluates the impact of nutrition during critical illness on long-term physical and functional recovery. Specific focus on the trial design and methodological limitations has been considered in detail. Limitations include delivery of caloric and protein targets, patient heterogeneity, short duration of intervention, inappropriate clinical outcomes and a disregard for baseline nutritional status and nutritional intake in the post-ICU period. With survivorship at the forefront of critical care research, it is imperative that nutrition studies carefully consider biological mechanisms and trial design because these factors can strongly influence outcomes, in particular long-term physical and functional outcome. Failure to do so may lead to inconclusive clinical trials and consequent rejection of the potentially beneficial effects of nutrition interventions during critical illness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available