4.8 Article

Restoration of TET2 Function Blocks Aberrant Self-Renewal and Leukemia Progression

Journal

CELL
Volume 170, Issue 6, Pages 1079-1095

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.032

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016887]
  2. US NIH [RO1 CA216421, R01 CA194923, R01 CA169784, R01 CA133379, R01CA149655, 5R01CA173636, R01 CA49132]
  3. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [6340-11, 6373-13]
  4. Feinberg Lymphoma Pilot Grant
  5. Chemotherapy Foundation
  6. V Foundation for Cancer Research
  7. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
  8. St. Baldrick's Cancer Research Foundation
  9. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  10. New York State Department of Health [CO030132]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss-of-function mutations in TET2 occur frequently in patients with clonal hematopoiesis, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with a DNA hypermethylation phenotype. To determine the role of TET2 deficiency in leukemia stem cell maintenance, we generated a reversible transgenic RNAi mouse to model restoration of endogenous Tet2 expression. Tet2 restoration reverses aberrant hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) self-renewal in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with vitamin C, a cofactor of Fe2+ and alpha-KG-dependent dioxygenases, mimics TET2 restoration by enhancing 5-hydroxymethylcytosine formation in Tet2-deficient mouse HSPCs and suppresses human leukemic colony formation and leukemia progression of primary human leukemia PDXs. Vitamin C also drives DNA hypomethylation and expression of a TET2-dependent gene signature in human leukemia cell lines. Furthermore, TET-mediated DNA oxidation induced by vitamin C treatment in leukemia cells enhances their sensitivity to PARP inhibition and could provide a safe and effective combination strategy to selectively target TET deficiency in cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available