4.3 Review

Current guidelines on prevention with a focus on dyslipidemias

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages S4-S10

Publisher

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.04.04

Keywords

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); cardiovascular risk; risk factors; cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. MSD
  3. Aegerion
  4. Abbot
  5. Amgen
  6. BMS
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Genzyme
  9. Kowa
  10. Merck
  11. Novartis
  12. Recordati
  13. Roche
  14. Sanofi
  15. Sigma-Tau
  16. Regneron
  17. Gilead
  18. Regeneron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Examination of the current the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease and the management of dyslipidemias finds much common ground. Both note that atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is, in most people, the product of a number of risk factors, notably tobacco exposure, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, inactivity, overweight and diabetes. They stress that risk calculators can help in the assessment of risk in apparently healthy persons. Persons with established ASCVD and many with diabetes or renal impairment are at high to very high risk and warrant intensive risk factor advice and guideline-based preventive therapies. The ACC/AHA guidelines favor the universal use of statins in all high-risk subjects and in primary prevention where the global risk exceeds 7.5% in 10 years, with a percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) based on statin intensity as the goal. In contrast, the ESC/EAS guidelines favor a goal or percentagebased reduction in LDL-C based on total risk and baseline LDL-C level. Both guidelines consider certain imaging and other measures to stratify risk as well as the use of non-statin therapies in those not achieving recommended targets. Perhaps the most important challenges are to stress similarities rather than differences, and to simplify communications with both healthcare professionals and the public.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available