4.8 Article

Scaling behaviour and rate-determining steps in filamentous self-assembly

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 7087-7097

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sc01965c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) through the ERC grant PhysProt [337969]
  2. Sidney Sussex College Cambridge
  3. Frances and Augusta Newman Foundation
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences
  7. Wellcome Trust
  8. Cambridge Centre for Misfolding Diseases
  9. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [SBF002\\1087] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of filaments from naturally occurring protein molecules is a process at the core of a range of functional and aberrant biological phenomena, such as the assembly of the cytoskeleton or the appearance of aggregates in Alzheimer's disease. The macroscopic behaviour associated with such processes is remarkably diverse, ranging from simple nucleated growth to highly cooperative processes with a well-defined lagtime. Thus, conventionally, different molecular mechanisms have been used to explain the self-assembly of different proteins. Here we show that this range of behaviour can be quantitatively captured by a single unifying Petri net that describes filamentous growth in terms of aggregate number and aggregate mass concentrations. By considering general features associated with a particular network connectivity, we are able to establish directly the rate-determining steps of the overall aggregation reaction from the system's scaling behaviour. We illustrate the power of this framework on a range of different experimental and simulated aggregating systems. The approach is general and will be applicable to any future extensions of the reaction network of filamentous self-assembly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available