4.7 Article

Toward high-efficiency production of biosurfactant rhamnolipids using sequential fed-batch fermentation based on a fill-and-draw strategy

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 317-324

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.06.007

Keywords

Sequential fed-batch fermentation; Biosurfactant; Rhamnolipids; Productivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406195]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30916011311]
  3. National High-Technology R&D Program (863 program) of China [SS2014AA022104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhamnolipids are the most promising biosurfactants, have widespread applications in many fields. However, low yield and productivity in fermentation caused a high production cost and thus prohibited the bulk applications of rhamnolipids in industry. In this study, a sequential fed-batch fermentation process with fill-and-draw operation was developed to improve rhamnolipids production. By utilizing this strategy, the total produced rhamnolipids reached over 150 g/L, had a 163% and 102% increase over the traditional batch and fed-batch processes, respectively. This remarkable high production efficiency was achieved by the well-maintained high productivity of 0.4 gin for a period of 17 d. Astonishingly, the conversion yield was high as 84%, while this value was only 53.2% and 42.7% in the traditional batch and fed-batch process, respectively. The high-efficiency rhamnolipids production in this sequential fed-batch fermentation could be largely explained by a high presence of cell coupled with the replenishment of nutrients and dilution of toxic byproducts via fill-and-draw operation. In all, this validated fermentation strategy offers a great prospect for high-efficiency production of rhamnolipids in industry. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available