4.6 Article

Regional analysis of age-related local bone loss in the spine of a healthy population using 3D voxel-based modeling

Journal

BONE
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 233-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.013

Keywords

Osteoporosis; Spine; Computed tomography; Voxel-based morphometry (VBM); T-score mapping; Statistical mapping; Age-related bone loss

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG BA4085/2-1, BA4906/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local variations in bone loss may be of great importance to individually predict osteoporotic fractures but are neglected by current densitometry techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional variations of normal bone loss at the spine among different age groups using voxel-based morphometry. Non-contrast MDCT scans of 16 patients under the age of 40 (mean age 26 years) without spinal pathology were identified as a reference cohort, where each thoracolumbar vertebra was assessed individually. For comparison, 38 patients >40 years were grouped by decades in 4 cohorts of 10 patients each, except the youngest, including 8 patients only. All spines were automatically detected, segmented and non-rigidly registered for spatially normalized vertebral bodies. Afterwards, statistical and T-score mapping was performed to highlight local density differences in comparison to the reference cohort. The calculated statistical maps of significantly affected density regions (ADR) started to highlight small local changes of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) distribution within the vertebra of L5 (ADR: 7.9%) in the fifties cohort. Regions near the endplates were most affected. The effect dramatically increased in the sixties cohort, where bone loss was most prominent from 112 to L2. In the seventies cohort, around 50% of voxels in T10 to L5 showed significantly decreased vBMD. In conclusion, ADR and local T-score maps of the spine showed age-related local variations in a healthy population, corresponding to known areas of fracture origination and increased fracture incidence. It thus might provide a powerful tool in diagnosis of osteoporosis. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available