4.7 Article

Regulation the morphology of cationized gold nanoparticles for effective gene delivery

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 18-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.056

Keywords

Gene delivery; Gold nanoparticles; Morphology; Cationized BSA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21474087, 51273177]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA51010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research indicated that the morphology of nanoparticles could result in distinct biological behaviors,thus played an important role in designing efficient gene delivery systems. Among them, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with various shapes were widely studied due to the good biocompatibility and easy modification ability. Our recent research indicated that polyethyleneimine-g-bovine serum albumin (BSA-PEI) as non-viral gene vector showed good colloid stability and high transfection efficiency. In this work, BSA-PEI was utilized to modify gold nanospheres (AuNSs) and gold nanorods (AuNRs) to investigate the influence of the morphology on gene delivery. Both AuNS@BSA-PEI and AuNR@BSA-PEI nanoparticles condensed DNA effectively at N/P ratio above 5 and maintained spherical or rod-like morphology respectively. Due to the higher surface charge density at the tips, the rod-like gene complexes were prone to use the tips to contact with cell membrane, which facilitated to be uptaked by HepG2 cells. The endocytosis inhibition experiments showed some differences in the endocytic pathway. Gene transfection experiment showed that the rod-like complexes had almost 100-fold higher of transfection level than that of spherical complexes at the N/P ratio of 20. This work provided a potential strategy for further design of gene vectors with improved transfection results by adjusting the morphology of gene vectors. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available