4.5 Article

Dry Matter and Nitrogen Uptake, Partitioning, and Removal across a Wide Range of Soybean Seed Yield Levels

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 2170-2182

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0322

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board
  2. DuPont Pioneer
  3. University of Wiscon-sin-Madison, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growers are concerned that soybean yield is restricted by limitations on biological N-2 fixation and soil nitrogen (N) mineralization. However, a comprehensive study characterizing actual soybean N requirements across wide-ranging seed yield environments is nonexistent for modern soybean production systems. Using six site-years and eight soybean varieties, plants were sampled at six growth stages and partitioned into their respective plant parts and analyzed. For each kilogram increase in yield, total dry matter accumulation, harvest index, and total N uptake increased by 1.45 kg, 0.0034%, and 0.054 kg, respectively, but all varied by environment at any specific yield level, whereas N removal did not (0.055 kg N kg(-1) grain). Nitrogen harvest index (NHI) increased (0.0019-0.004% kg(-1) grain) with yield but varied by environment and yield level, resulting in indices between 73 and 90%. Peak uptake rates for N were 3.6 to 4.3 kg ha(-1) d(-1) between R4 and R5, depending on the yield level. After R5.5, 66 to 69% of vegetative N was remobilized to the seed, which accounted for 50.4% of seed N at the low yield level (3608 kg ha(-1)), but only 38.9% at the high yield level (5483 kg ha(-1)). Moreover, higher yields attained a greater portion of their total N uptake after R5.5 (40.1%) compared with the low yield level (29.7%). These results highlight greater remobilization efficiencies and late-season N uptake in conjunction with greater NHI to support higher yields per unit of N uptake in current production realities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available