4.7 Article

PD-L1 Expression in Melanoma: A Quantitative Immunohistochemical Antibody Comparison

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages 4938-4944

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1821

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bloombergsimilar toKimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  2. Dermatology Foundation
  3. WW. Smith Foundation
  4. Moving for Melanoma Delaware
  5. NIH [R01 CA142779, T32 CA193145]
  6. Melanoma Research Alliance
  7. Stand Up To Cancer-Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Translational Cancer Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT1012]
  8. American Association for Cancer Research, the Scientific Partner of SU2C

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: PD-L1 expression in the pretreatment tumor microenvironment enriches for response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the performance of five monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibodies used in recent landmark publications. Experimental Design: PD-L1 IHC was performed on 34 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival melanoma samples using the 5H1, SP142, 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 clones. The percentage of total cells (including melanocytes and immune cells) demonstrating cell surface PD-L1 staining, as well as intensity measurements/H-scores, were assessed for each melanoma specimen using a computer-assisted platform. Staining properties were compared between antibodies. Results: Strong correlations were observed between the percentage of PD-L1(+) cells across all clones studied (R-2 = 0.81-0.96). When present, discordant results were attributable to geographic heterogeneity of the melanoma tissue section rather than differences in PD-L1 antibody staining characteristics. PD-L1 intensity/H-scores strongly correlated with percentage of PD-L1(=) cells (R-2 > 0.78, all clones). Conclusions: The 5H1, SP142, 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 clones all demonstrated similar performance characteristics when used in a standardized IHC assay on melanoma specimens. Reported differences inPD-L1IHCassays using these antibodies are thusmost likely due to assay characteristics beyond the antibody itself. Our findings also argue against the inclusion of an intensity/H-score in chromogenic PD-L1 IHC assays. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available