Journal
CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 297-308Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.122
Keywords
Micropollutants; Wastewater effluent; Photolysis; Photodegradation; Humic acid; Nitrate
Categories
Funding
- Water Research Australia [4505-14]
- Melbourne Water
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The photodegradation of seven micropollutants commonly found in municipal wastewater, namely caffeine, carbamazepine, diuron, simazine, sulfamethoxazole, triclosan and 2,4-D, was investigated in pure water and secondary effluent to understand the direct and indirect photolysis of these compounds under natural sunlight irradiation. Sulfamethoxazole and triclosan were readily photodegraded with half-lives of 5.8 and 1.8 h, respectively, whilst the others were relatively resistant towards sunlight irradiation. Enhanced degradation was observed in secondary effluent compared with in the pure water matrix for all compounds, except for triclosan. It was confirmed that hydroxyl radicals played an important role in the photodegradation of the micropollutants while singlet oxygen may also play a role. The contribution of hydroxyl radical to the overall degradation of the five compounds that were resistant to direct sunlight accounted for 32%-70%. The impact of humic acid and nitrate, two known photo-sensitisers and wastewater components, on the photodegradation of the seven micropollutants in pure water was investigated under simulated solar radiation. The presence of nitrate promoted the photochemical loss of all seven micropollutants, however, humic acid caused promotion or inhibition, depending on the characteristics of the micropollutant. Humic acid enhanced the photolytic degradation of caffeine, sulfamethoxazole and diuron, while it hindered the photodegradation of the other four compounds by absorbing the available irradiation energy and/or reforming the parent compound. Furthermore, it was shown that there was only a small increase (up to 15%) in photodegradation of the compounds at 25 degrees C compared with that at 10 degrees C in the simulated system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available