4.5 Article

Feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination for hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to locoregional therapies

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages 1732-1738

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13301

Keywords

Cancer immunotherapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune response; overall survival; personalized peptide vaccine

Categories

Funding

  1. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07229] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to locoregional therapy is dismal, even following treatment with sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor. To develop a more efficacious treatment, we undertook a feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for HCC, in which the peptides were selected from 31 peptide candidates based on the pre-existing immunity. Twenty-six HCC patients refractory to locoregional therapies (cohort 1) and 30 patients refractory to both locoregional and systemic therapies (cohort 2) were entered into the study. There were no severe adverse events related to PPV except for one injection site reaction. At the end of the first cycle of six vaccinations, successful CTL or IgG boosting was observed in 57% or 46% of patients in cohort 1 and in 54% or 52% of patients in cohort 2, respectively. Successful IgG boosting at the end of the second cycle was observed in the majority of patients tested. Median overall survival was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 12.2-22.5 months) in cohort 1, and 8.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-12.2 months) in cohort 2. Based on the higher rates of immune boosting and the safety profile of PPV, further clinical studies of PPV would be warranted for patients with HCC refractory to not only locoregional therapy but also both locoregional and systemic therapies. The protocol of this study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000001882 and UMIN000003590).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available