4.6 Review

Chloroethylating nitrosoureas in cancer therapy: DNA damage, repair and cell death signaling

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER
Volume 1868, Issue 1, Pages 29-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.01.004

Keywords

DNA double-strand breaks; Homologous recombination; Interstrand crosslinks; Cancer therapy; Glioblastoma; Nitrosoureas

Funding

  1. DFG (German Research Foundation) [NI1319/1-1, NI1319/1-2, RO3617/4-1, KA724/18]
  2. German Cancer Aid
  3. Wilhelm Sander Foundation
  4. University Mainz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloroethylating nitrosoureas (CNU), such as lomustine, nimustine, semustine, carmustine and fotemustine are used for the treatment of malignant gliomas, brain metastases of different origin, melanomas and Hodgkin disease. They alkylate the DNA bases and give rise to the formation of monoadducts and subsequently interstrand crosslinks (ICL). ICL are critical cytotoxic DNA lesions that link the DNA strands covalently and block DNA replication and transcription. As a result, S phase progression is inhibited and cells are triggered to undergo apoptosis and necrosis, which both contribute to the effectiveness of CNU-based cancer therapy. However, tumor cells resist chemotherapy through the repair of CNU-induced DNA damage. The suicide enzyme O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes the precursor DNA lesion O-6-chloroethylguanine prior to its conversion into ICL In cells lacking MGMT, the formed ICL evoke complex enzymatic networks to accomplish their removal. Here we discuss the mechanism of ICL repair as a survival strategy of healthy and cancer cells and DNA damage signaling as a mechanism contributing to CNU-induced cell death. We also discuss therapeutic implications and strategies based on sequential and simultaneous treatment with CNU and the methylating drug temozolomide. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available