4.7 Article

Climate controls over the net carbon uptake period and amplitude of net ecosystem production in temperate and boreal ecosystems

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 9-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.009

Keywords

Net ecosystem productivity; Interannual variation; Net carbon uptake period; Maximum carbon uptake amplitude; Phenology; Climate

Funding

  1. CFCAS
  2. NSERC
  3. BIOCAP
  4. Environment Canada
  5. NRCan
  6. CarboEuropeIP
  7. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  8. iLEAPS
  9. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. University of Tuscia
  12. Universite Laval and Environment Canada
  13. US Department of Energy
  14. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31625006]
  15. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB956300]
  16. CAS Strategic Priority Research Program [XDA05050702]
  17. Thousand Youth Talents Plan
  18. Midwestern Regional Center of NICCR [DE-FC02-06ER64158]
  19. FASET
  20. NSF [DEB-0911461]
  21. U.S. National Science Foundation [1552976, 1632810]
  22. USDA National Institutes of Food and Agriculture Hatch project [228396]
  23. China Scholarship Council
  24. Directorate For Geosciences
  25. ICER [1523628] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The seasonal and interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon cycle is regulated by the interactions of climate and ecosystem function. However, the key factors and processes determining the interannual variability of net ecosystem productivity (NEP) in different biomes are far from clear. Here, we quantified yearly anomalies of seasonal and annual NEP, net carbon uptake period (CUP), and the maximum daily NEP (NEPmax) in response to climatic variables in 24 deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), evergreen forest (EF), and grassland (GRA) ecosystems that include at least eight years of eddy covariance observations. Over the 228 site-years studied, interannual variations in NEP were mostly explained by anomalies of CUP and NEPmax CUP was determined by spring and autumn net carbon uptake phenology, which were sensitive to annual meteorological variability. Warmer spring temperatures led to an earlier start of net carbon uptake activity and higher spring and annual NEP values in DBF and EF, while warmer autumn temperatures in DBF, higher autumn radiation in EF, and more summer and autumn precipitation in GRA resulted in a later ending date of net carbon uptake and associated higher autumn and annual NEP. Anomalies in NEPmax s were determined by summer precipitation in DBF and GRA, and explained more than 50% of variation in summer NEP anomalies for all the three biomes. Results demonstrate the role of meteorological variability in controlling CUP and NEP,, which in turn help describe the seasonal and interannual variability of NEP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available